HUKUM CAMBUK & OPINI PUBLIK: ANALISIS TEMATIK TANGGAPAN NETIZEN TERHADAP BERITA PELANGGARAN SYARIAT ISLAM DI AKUN FACEBOOK MEDIA MASSA

Ainal Fitri, Muhammad Haekal

Abstract


This qualitative descriptive research studied the public narratives regarding the caning execution news on Serambinews.com's Facebook fan page. Apart from that, this research also investigated the relationship between Facebook users' discussion against public policy (Sharia law) and the existence of Serambinews.com as the news media. This research used the five most commented news links from January 2018 to December 2020 as the data. This data was analyzed using Thematic Analysis and studied using the concept of Public Opinion. The results showed that the public often discussed four dominant themes, including two topics that exhibited negative nuances, such as proposing extreme punishment and defamation against the convicts. These themes were a reflection of the growing public opinion regarding the caning in Aceh. Negative public opinion had the potential to form a consensus and affected public policy regarding Sharia law. But on the other hand, despite the domination of negative public opinion, the researcher argued that Serambinews.com gained economic benefits from this practice.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S., Haines‐Saah, R. J., Afzal, A. R., Tam‐Tham, H., Al Mamun, M., Hemmelgarn, B. R., & Turin, T. C. (2017). User‐driven conversations about dialysis through Facebook: a qualitative thematic analysis. Nephrology, 22(4), 301–307.

Aminah, A. (2019). Peran Media Sosial “Facebook” dalam Proses Pembentukan Opini Publik Menjelang Pemilihan Umum Legislatif 2019 di Kabupaten Aceh Jaya. SOURCE: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2).

Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 204–220.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. sage.

Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.

Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 16–35.

Cvijikj, I. P., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843–861.

Davison, W. P. (1958). The public opinion process. Public Opinion Quarterly, 22(2), 91–106.

Dimyati, D., & Juvenia, J. (2017). FACEBOOK USAGE TOWARDS READING INTEREST AT NEWS PORTAL MERDEKA. COM IN NORTH CIKARANG. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 550–569.

Gardner, B., Smith, L., & Mansfield, L. (2017). How did the public respond to the 2015 expert consensus public health guidance statement on workplace sedentary behaviour? A qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–10.

Gerston, L. N. (2014). Public policy making: Process and principles. Routledge.

Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2008). Public opinion. The International Encyclopedia of Communication.

Hill, C. A., Dean, E., & Murphy, J. (2013). Social media, sociality, and survey research. John Wiley & Sons.

Khusna, I. H. (2016). Opini Publik Cerminan dari Pemerintah dan Kebijakannya. Promedia.

Klašnja, M., Barberá, P., Beauchamp, N., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2015). Measuring public opinion with social media data. In The Oxford Handbook of Polling and Polling Methods (pp. 555–582). Oxford University Press.

Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. (2016). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502–520.

McCombs, M., Holbert, L., Kiousis, S., & Wanta, W. (2011). The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Polity.

Moy, P., & Bosch, B. (2013). Theories of public opinion.

Neubaum, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2017). Monitoring the opinion of the crowd: Psychological mechanisms underlying public opinion perceptions on social media. Media Psychology, 20(3), 502–531.

Rahman, Z., Kumaran Suberamanian, D., Zanuddin, H., Moghavvemi, S., & MdNasir, M. H. N. Bin. (2016). SNS METRICS ANALYSIS “A STUDY ON FANPAGE INTERACTIVE. Intl. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res, 14, 1405–1415.

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17–37.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/source.v7i1.3285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SOURCE: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi indexed by:
 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal SOURCE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.