“Did They Review My Work Correctly?”: Students’ Perspectives towards the Implementation of Peer Review

Refanja Rahmatillah, Rizki Fajrita, Veni Nella Syahputri

Abstract


The notion of utilizing peer review to assist student’s performance in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms has been the focus of research, yet there are still some shortcomings emerged in its implementation from both students’ and teachers’ sides. This study aims to determine students’ perspectives towards the implementation of peer review technique in their English writing class. The relevant data of this study are obtained by giving online survey questionnaire consisting of 14 questions regarding their perception towards the implementation of peer review technique in the students’ previous Argumentative Writingclassroom of Syiah Kuala University. The responses are analyzed by employing both of quantitative and qualitative method. The result of the analysis indicates that most of the students perceive that peer review is useful for the success of their learning, while at the same time 50% of them still get anxiety while giving feedback due to lack of English competence. Students’ responses also suggest that teacher intervention is the most essential factor in giving appropriate feedback since students are unconfident of their friends work and still favor teacher’s correction.


Keywords


Peer review; students’ perspectives; English competence; anxiety; teacher intervention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, D. & Mills, A. (2016). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498-513. doi: 10.1177/1362168814561902

Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and friendship bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 1-10.doi: 10.1186/2229-0443-3-11

Behin, B. & Hamidi, S. (2011). Peer correction: The key to improve the Iranian English as a foreign language learners` productive writing skill. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1057-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.206

Chong, I. (2017). How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study. Assessing Writing, 31, 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.002

Duchesne, S., McMaugh, A., Bochner, S., & Krause, K. D. (2013). Educational psychology: For learning and teaching (4th ed.). South Melbourne, Vic.: Cengage Learning.

Fariduddin, M., & Parlindungan, F. (2018). Comprehending narrative text: The effectiveness of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC). Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 5(2), 139-148.

Ghahari, S. & Farokhnia, F. (2017). Peer versus teacher assessment: Implications for CAF triad language ability and critical reflections. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2016.1275991

Liang, M. Y. (2010). Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision related discourse. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 45– 64.

McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). "Just enough to make you take it seriously": Exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65(6), 677-693. doi: 10.1007/s 10734-012-9570-z

Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. New York; London: Routledge.

Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155-168. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct068.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v1i1.1747

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Education, Language, and Religion

p-ISSN : 2721-429X
e-ISSN : 2721-4273

Published by Language Center of Universitas Teuku Umar
Website : http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/IJELR
Email    : ijelr@utu.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.