Pengaruh Pemberian Subsidi BBM Solar terhadap Peningkatan Persepsi Keuntungan Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil di Kabupaten Aceh Barat

Muhaymin Muhaymin

Abstract


Diesel subsidies are very important for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in the West Aceh Region. This area is a center of agriculture and industry which is experiencing difficulties where everything depends on income in terms of agriculture and fisheries. These two processes are currently very much underpinning production machines driven by diesel-powered e-engines. The purpose of this research is to see how far the perception of the recipient of the subsidy is in receiving the subsidy itself. The 63 samples for this study were taken from the database of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) receiving diesel subsidies owned by the West Aceh District Industry and Trade Agency. From the results of the dissemination it is known that the subsidies given are still considered insufficient and need to be increased and the subsidy recipients state the amount of their income as the basis of the benefits they received.  

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2017). Implications of energy subsidy reform in India. Energy Policy, 102(March 2016), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.036

Bown, C. P., & Hillman, J. A. (2019). WTO’ing a Resolution to the China Subsidy Problem. Journal of International Economic Law, l22(4), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz035

Chen, J. Y., Dimitrov, S., & Pun, H. (2019). The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega (United Kingdom), 86, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012

Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, 42(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Handoko, R., & Patriadi, P. (2005). Evaluasi Kebijakan Subsidi Non BBM. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 9(4), 42–64.

Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2017). Implications of energy subsidy reform in India. Energy Policy, 102(March 2016), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.036

Bown, C. P., & Hillman, J. A. (2019). WTO’ing a Resolution to the China Subsidy Problem. Journal of International Economic Law, l22(4), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz035

Chen, J. Y., Dimitrov, S., & Pun, H. (2019). The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega (United Kingdom), 86, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012

Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, 42(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Handoko, R., & Patriadi, P. (2005). Evaluasi Kebijakan Subsidi Non BBM. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 9(4), 42–64.

Hoekman, B., & Nelson, D. (2020). Rethinking international subsidy rules. World Economy, 43(12), 3104–3132. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13022

Hottenrott, H., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2014). (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. Research Policy, 43(6), 1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.004

Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C., & Veugelers, R. (2017). Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development. Research Policy, 46(6), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.004

Ismail, N. (2019). Merit System Dalam Mewujudkan Transparansi Pembinaan Karier Aparatur Sipil Negara. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v11i1.2023

Jayne, T. S., & Rashid, S. (2013). Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 44(6), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12073

Kashyap, A. K., Kovrijnykh, N., Li, J., & Pavlova, A. (2021). The benchmark inclusion subsidy. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 756–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.04.021

Komara, E. (2019). Kompetensi Profesional Pegawai ASN (Aparatur Sipil Negara) di Indonesia. Mimbar Pendidikan, 4(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v4i1.16971

Li, Y., Tong, Y., Ye, F., & Song, J. (2020). The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs. product subsidy. International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 4932–4946. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1730466

Mason, N. M., & Jayne, T. S. (2013). Fertiliser subsidies and smallholder commercial fertiliser purchases: Crowding out, leakage and policy implications for Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 558–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12025

Mason, N. M., Jayne, T. S., & Mofya-Mukuka, R. (2013). Zambia’s input subsidy programs. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 44(6), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12077

Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991

Munawar, D. (2014). Memahami Pengertian dan Kebijakan Subsidi dalam APBN.

Rice, M. F. (2007). A post-modern cultural competency framework for public administration and public service delivery. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 622–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550710823524

Sahlman, W. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90065-8

Shadikhodjaev, S. (2021). The WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and Unilateralism of Special Economic Zones. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(2), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab013

Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., & Toivanen, O. (2013). Market failures and the additionality effects of public support to private R&D: Theory and empirical implications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.02.002

Xu, Z., Burke, W. J., Jayne, T. S., & Govereh, J. (2009). Do input subsidy programs “crowd in” or “crowd out” commercial market development? Modeling fertilizer demand in a two-channel marketing system. Agricultural Economics, 40(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00361.x

Zhang, M. M., Zhou, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Chen, H. T. (2017). Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71(November), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.115




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jimetera.v3i1.6474

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.