Gender and Lexical Variation in Pitch, Duration, and Intensity: A Phonetic Study of Indonesian-Origin Words

Zahratul Idami, Dedy Suhery, Rangkuti Rahmadsyah, Nina Tiya Hara, Ana Rahmawati Rangkuti

Abstract


This study investigates how gender influences suprasegmental features—specifically pitch, duration, and intensity—in the pronunciation of Indonesian-origin words. The research addresses the problem of limited phonetic studies examining gender-based acoustic variation in Indonesian, particularly in devoiced stop consonants. The objective is to analyze whether and how gender differences manifest in these prosodic elements. Using a descriptive qualitative method, data were collected from ten participants—five males and five females—from diverse ethnic backgrounds (Bataknese, Javanese, Karonese, and Melayunese), all residing in Medan, North Sumatra. Nine commonly used Indonesian-origin words were selected, and acoustic features were analyzed using PRAAT software. The results show that female speakers consistently produced higher pitch values across all words, with peaks reaching up to 499 Hz, while male speakers demonstrated lower and narrower pitch ranges, as low as 94 Hz. Duration values also varied more among female speakers, ranging from 0.097 ms to 0.469 ms, indicating more dynamic articulation patterns, although some male speakers also showed extended durations in specific contexts. Intensity levels ranged from 23 dB to 54 dB, with female speakers exhibiting greater variability in loudness—from soft to very loud—whereas male speakers maintained a more stable and moderate intensity. These findings suggest that pitch differences are primarily influenced by physiological factors such as vocal fold structure, while duration and intensity are more reflective of individual articulation style, emotional expressiveness, and speech clarity. Despite limitations in audio editing features in PRAAT, the study provides new insights into how gender and speaker identity shape suprasegmental variation in Indonesian phonetics.

Keywords


duration; gender variation; Indonesian phonetics; intensity; pitch

Full Text:

PDF

References


Athanasopoulou, A., Vogel, I., & Pincus, N. (2021). Prosodic prominence in a stressless language: An acoustic investigation of Indonesian. Journal of Linguistics, 57(4), 695–735. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0022226721000141

Bahari, B., Sitanggang, C, N., Ismayani, H, & Lubis, Y. (2023). Phonological patterns and processes: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies (IJOMSS), 1(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33151/ijomss.v1i1.74

Choi, S., & Kang, O. (2023). The roles of suprasegmental features in assessing paired speaking tasks in high-stakes language assessment. System, 119, 103183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103183.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mix method approach. In University of Nebraska, Lincoln (4th ed.). Sage.

Diani, I., & Azwandi, A. (2021). Phonological change processes of English and Indonesian language. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature Vol 6 No 1, 6(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v6i1.13642

Gósy, M. (2023). Occurrences and durations of filled pauses in relation to words and silent pauses in spontaneous speech. Languages, 8(1), 79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010079.

Hara, N., Siregar, M., Suhery, D., & Rangkuti, R. (2024). Devoicing of final voiced stop consonants in Indonesian. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature., 11(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.704

Irawan, Y. (2017). Fonetik akustik: Sebuah pengantar telaah wujud akustik bahasa. CV Angkasa.

Iwasaki, R., Roon, K., Shaw, J., Tiede, M., & Whalen, D. (2022). Retention of devoiced vowels in Tokyo Japanese: Evidence from lip articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America., 152(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0016299

Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2010). A Course in honetics sixth edition. Cengage Learning.

Martin, P. (2021). Fundamental frequency and intensity. In Speech Acoustic Analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808411.ch7.

Mawarni, N., Syarfina, T., Zulhantiar, P., & Rangkuti, R. (2024). Analysis of Javanese language prosody (acoustic phonetic study). Fonologi : Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris., 2(4), 63–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1136

Mose, E. (2021). Phonological processes in Ekegusii borrowing: A constraint-based approach. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 7(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3233

Pépiot, E., & Arnold, A. (2020). Cross-gender differences in English/French bilingual speakers: A multiparametric study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128, 153–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520973514

Safeer, N., Anjum, U., & Saleem, T. (2024). Gender-based study of paired monophthongs: A sociophonetics approach. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 30(2), 231–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2024-3002-15

Shang, C. Y. (2016). Research on the application of Praat in English pronunciation class. Journal of Mudanjiang University, 25(4), 4.

Steffman, J., & Jun, S. (2019). Perceptual integration of pitch and duration: Prosodic and psychoacoustic influences in speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(3), EL251–EL257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5126107

Suhery, D., Meutia, C, I., Raza, M, H., & Idami, Z. (2023). Interlingual interference in multilingual students: An optimality theory approach. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 9(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.9.3.8875.275-283

Traunmüller, H., & Eriksson, A. (2000). Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(6), 3438–3451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429414

Wu, A. (2024). Gender and situational variation of pitch dynamism in Thai speakers. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 29(45), 60–80.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v7i2.13165

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 zahratul idami

p-ISSN : 2721-429X
e-ISSN : 2721-4273

Published by Language Center of Universitas Teuku Umar
Website : http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/IJELR
Email    : ijelr@utu.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.