TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NEGERI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA BISNIS YANG MEMUAT KLAUSULA ARBITRASE

Rachmatika Lestari

Abstract


The provisions of Article 3 and Article 11 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Arbitration and APS Act gives authority to institute arbitration to resolve a dispute that has been established settlement through arbitration. But in reality, the judiciary in this case the District Court still examine the dispute and make a decision, although in the agreement have included the arbitration clause, such as the dispute between PT. Pertamina Hulu Energy Raja Tempirai (PHE RT) against PT. Golden Spike Energy Indonesia (GSEI). The main problem in this research is; (1) does the district court have the authority to examine and dispute the dispute in the event of an arbitration clause? and (2) in what cases have the district court authorized to adjudicate a business dispute containing an arbitration clause?. The purpose of this study is to identify and explain about authority and in terms of whether the District Court has the authority to examine, hear and decide disputes of business containing the arbitration clause. This study is a normative juridical research with the aim of studying the principles and rules contained in the science of law. The data used consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Results showed that the Institute of Justice is required to respect the arbitration institution, the case that own the arbitration clause could not be submitted to the District Court, unless there Torts in terms of making the arbitration decision is unfounded in good faith. About the things that cause the District Court jurisdiction over business disputes containing the arbitration clause, among others, relating to the cancellation of the arbitral award on the basis of Torts in terms of making the arbitration decision is unfounded in good faith (Article 70 of the Arbitration and APS Act).

Keywords: Authority of the District Court, Business Dispute and Arbitration Clause

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku-buku

Gatot Soemartono. (2006). Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Johny Ibrahim. (2007). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

R. Subekti. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Rachmadi Usman. (2002). Hukum Arbitrase Nasional. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Retnowulan Sutantio. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Suyud Margono. (2004). ADR (Alternative Disputes Resolution) dan Arbitrase (Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sudargo Gautama. (2004). Arbitrase Luar Negeri dan Pemakaian Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Internet

Indonesia Banking Restructuring Agency (IBRA), Arbitrase, Pilihan Tanpa Kepastian, diakses dari situs http://gontha.com/view.pnp?nid=104




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v3i2.1440

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan

Flag Counter

 

free stats  

Jurnal Ius Civile
p-ISSN: 2614-5723  I  e-ISSN: 2520-6617  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +6282214066169 l +6285277034555
 is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International License