PERBANDINGAN DINDING PRECAST DAN BATA RINGAN TERHADAP BIAYA DAN WAKTU PADA FACADE PROYEK SUNCITY APARTMENT SIDOARJO

nur hanifah eka putri, I Nyoman Dita Pahang Putra, Anna Rumintang Nauli

Abstract


The choice of material type has a big influence in the aspect of workmanship which includes the amount of cost and time spent processing. One of the projects that requires selecting the type of material is the facade wall work. In general, wall materials use conventional materials such as lightweight bricks, along with technological advances, they begin to switch to other materials that support the cost and time, namely using precast or precast materials. Before materials that exist, namely precast wall and light brick wall, the differences in the existing materials and manufacture cause different stages of work which affect the implementation time and costs between precast wall and light brick work. This study uses data in the form of implementation images, RAB, HSPK, SNI 6897: 2008, and SNI 2837: 2008 to become the base of calculating costs and time of the two implementation methods. Then, analyze the two implementation methods to find out what causes differences in cost and implementation time requirements. Comparative analysis between the two methods of implementation shows that work with precast material costs Rp. 5,633,609,447 and the work time is 113.86 days, while work with light brick material requires a cost of Rp. 3,136,802,766 with an implementation time of 154 days. This shows that precast wall work is 44.32% more expensive than the light brick, but precast wall work can minimize the time by 26.1%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2008. Tata Cara Perhitungan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Dinding untuk Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung dan Perumahan. (SNI 6897:2008). Jakarta

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2008. Tata Cara Perhitungan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Plesteran untuk Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung dan Perumahan. (SNI 2837:2008). Jakarta

Ervianto, Wulfram I. 2006. Eksplorasi Teknologi Dalam Proyek Konstruksi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Hendriyani, Irna., Andi Marini dan Nur Intan Putri. 2018. Analisis SWOT Pemilihan Material Dinding Bata Merah dan Bata Ringan di Penajam Paser Utara. Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 2(1):24.

Ibrahim, Bachtiar. 1993. Rencana dan Estimate Real of Cost. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Jitchaiyaphum, Khamphee., Theerawat Sinsiri dan Prinya Chindaprasirt. 2011. Cellular Lightweight Concrete Containing Pozzolan Materials. Procedia Engineering. 15:1157.

Kumara H., Topcu dan Karakurt. 2009. Properties of the Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Produced Coal Bottom Ash. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209: 767.

Najoan, Candy Happy., Jermias Tjakra dan Pingkan A. 2016. Analisis Metode Pelaksanaan Plat Precast dengan Plat Konvensional Ditinjau dari Waktu dan Biaya (Studi Kasus: Markas Komando Daerah Militer Manado). Jurnal Sipil Statik. 4(5):320.

Putra, I Nyoman Dita Pahang. 2018. Land Value Estimation Model as Impact of Infrastructure Development in Kaliwates Jember Indonesia. Internation Journal Teknik Sipil dan Teknologi (IJCIET). 9(11):1017

Sahid, Muh Nur dan Imam safi’i. 2012. Analisa Perbandingan Produktivitas Kerja pada Pekerjaan Dinding Bata Konvensional dengan Dinding Blok Hebel. Simposium Nasional RAPI XI FT UMS. TS-36.

Sari, Novita Sely. 2019. Evaluasi Anggaran Biaya Menggunakan Batu Merah dan Batu Bata Ringan Gedung Kantor Kelurahan Bareng Kecamatan Klaten Tengah Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Qua Teknika. 9(1):2-4.

Telaumbanua, Tommy A., Jantje B. M. dan Mochtar Sibi. 2017. Perencanaan Waktu Penyelesaian Proyek Toko Modisland Manado dengan Metode CPM. Jurnal Sipil Statik. 5(8):10.

Yulitianingsih dan Trijeti. 2014. Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Dinding Precast dengan Dinding Konvensional Ditinjau dari Segi Waktu dan Biaya (Studi Kasus Gedung Apartmen di Jakarta Selatan). Jurnal Konstruksia. 6(1):46.

Yuntava, Elmi., Irika Widiasanti dan Eka M. 2012. Perbandingan Pekerjaan Pasangan Dinding Bata Ringan dengan Pasangan Dinding Panel Precast Ditinjau dari Segi Biaya dan Waktu. Jurnal Menara Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNJ. 7(2):9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jts-utu.v7i1.3034

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Teknologi Konstruksi