Reshaping Governance: Mainstreaming Co-Production in the Megaproject Development of Nusantara Capital City, Indonesia

Elis Mardianti, Muhammad Dzulfikar Al Ghofiqi, Falih Suaedi, Erna Setijaningrum, Sulikah Asmorowati

Abstract


Many large-scale development projects, including Indonesia’s new capital relocation, face challenges in ensuring inclusive and participatory governance. The development of Nusantara Capital City (IKN) has been marked by limited public consultation, rapid policy formulation, and marginalization of local communities, leading to recurring resistance at various levels. These issues threaten the achievement of SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), both of which emphasize inclusive and transparent governance. This study explores co-production as a governance approach to enhance citizen engagement in the context of IKN’s development. Employing a qualitative literature review, it examines how co-production is conceptualized and practiced in the planning of IKN. The findings indicate that while co-production is recognized in official discourse, its implementation remains limited and fragmented. Key barriers include weak legal frameworks, lack of institutional mechanisms, and absence of a formal oversight body. Strengthening co-production is crucial for ensuring transparency, inclusivity, and accountability in IKN’s governance. The study proposes a comprehensive framework involving legal reforms, institutionalization of participatory mechanisms, and enhanced accountability tools. These efforts are vital to transform IKN from a top-down megaproject into a model of inclusive urban governance.

Keywords


Co-production, Governance, Megaproject Development, Nusantara Capital City, Public Participation, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adinda, P. (2024). Membongkar Warisan Ugal-ugalan Pembangunan IKN ala Jokowi. Project Multatuli. https://projectmultatuli.org/membongkar-warisan-ugal-ugalan-pembangunan-ikn-ala-jokowi/

Amallya, D., Baskoro, D. O., Putra, A. R. A., Basir, A. K. G., Nur’Aslam, M. F., & Kiswanto, M. A. (2023). Cetak Biru Kota Cerdas Nusantara. 1–102.

Aminah, S. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Ilmu Politik. Kencana.

Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2022). Handbook On Theories Of Governance: Second Edition. In Handbook on Theories of Governance. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972

Aprilia, D., & Supentri. (2024). Dampak Dan Resiko Pemindahan Ibu Kota Terhadap Perekonomian Di Indonesia. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i3.285

Asmorowati, S., Husniati, C., & Ayu, D. R. (2022). Peran Policy Entrepreneur dalam Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara. Konferensi Nasional Sosiologi IX APSSI 2022, 202–206. https://pkns.portalapssi.id/index.php/pkns/article/view/80%0Ahttps://pkns.portalapssi.id/index.php/pkns/article/download/80/79

Bachechi, A. (2025). Ibu Kota Nusantara: Understanding the Dynamics of Indonesia’s New Capital Construction (pp. 19–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4988-1_2

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956

Buana, M. S., Listiningrum, P., Nugroho, P. A., & Marbun, A. A. Y. (2023). The Nusantara Capital City Project: Why Development and Human Rights Do Not Always Mix. Law and Development Review, 16(1), 185–223. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2022-0063

Cheyne, C. (2015). Changing Urban Governance in New Zealand: Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy in Local Authority Planning and Decision-Making 1989–2014. Urban Policy and Research, 33(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.994740

Chukwuere, J. E. (2023). Exploring Literature Review Methodologies in Information Systems Research: a Comparative Study. Education & Learning in Developing Nations, 1(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.26480/eldn.02.2023.74.82

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Mehods Approach. In European University Institute (Fifth Edit, Issue 2). Sage Publications. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=PT%0Ahttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52012PC0011:pt:NOT

Dalidjo, N. (2021). Konflik Lahan di Bakal Ibu Kota Baru. https://aman.or.id/news/read/Konflik Lahan di Bakal Ibu Kota Baru

Databoks.co.id. (2024). IKN, Sumber Konflik Agraria Terbesar di Sektor Infrastruktur. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ekonomi-makro/statistik/5c4f09ee8c3845d/ikn-sumber-konflik-agraria-terbesar-di-sektor-infrastruktur

Della Spina, L., Scrivo, R., Ventura, C., & Viglianisi, A. (2015). Urban Renewal: Negotiation Procedures and Evaluation Models (pp. 88–103). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_7

Farr, M. (2018). Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes. Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317747444

Fisher, M., Longman, R. J., Maryudi, A., & Laraswati, D. (2024). Nusantara: Climate Dilemmas of a “Green” Capital City in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Issues, 27(169), 1–10.

Fletcher, G., & Griffiths, M. (2020). Digital transformation during a lockdown. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185

Hermansyah, H. (2019). PARTISIPASI SOSIAL DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH (SEBUAH TINJAUAN KONSEP). Al Qisthi: Jurnal Sosial Dan Politik. https://doi.org/10.47030/jaq.v9i1.64

Hidayat, R. (2023). KONFLIK AGRARIA MASYARAKAT ADAT DALAM PEMINDAHAN IBU KOTA NEGARA. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sosiologi (PKNS), 140–151. https://pkns.portalapssi.id/index.php/pkns/article/view/79

Jati, W. R., Syahid, C. N., Lissandhi, A. N., & Maulana, Y. (2023). Assessing the Implementation of a ‘City for All’ within the New Indonesian Capital City: Smart and Green City Perspective. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 34(3), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2023.34.3.1

Kaye-Essien, C. W., & Bhuiyan, S. (2022). Capital city boosterism as policy legitimation: A discursive perspective of Egypt’s New Administrative Capital. City, Culture and Society, 28, 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100437

Kjaerum, M. (2022). A decisive moment: human rights or authoritarianism? It is a choice. Global Discourse, 12(3–4), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16333404176547

Kompas.com. (2022). Sebut IKN Dibangun Tanpa Legitimasi Kuat Masyarakat Adat di Kalimantan, AMAN: Yang Diajak Bicara Kan Elite. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/18/16091911/sebut-ikn-dibangun-tanpa-legitimasi-kuat-masyarakat-adat-di-kalimantan-aman?page=all

Kompas.com. (2024). Segudang Masalah IKN Temuan BPK, Mulai dari Pendanaan, Lahan, hingga Aset.

Kompas.id. (2022). Tahapan Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) Nusantara.

Kompas.id. (2023). Balikpapan, Penyangga IKN Nusantara dan Bahaya yang Mengikutinya.

Kumparan.com. (2024). BPK Temukan 4 Masalah Pembangunan IKN, Apa Aja ?

Leonardi, C., & Not, E. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities for ICT in Co-production: A Case Study of Public Service Innovation in an Italian Municipality. DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543462

Li, X., & Ding, Y. (2020). Holistic Governance for Sustainable Public Services: Reshaping Government–Enterprise Relationships in China’s Digital Government Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051778

Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2023). Dynamics in the governance of smart cities: insights from South Korean smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2063158

Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2021). User and Community Co-production of Public Value. In The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (pp. 31–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_2

McMullin, C. (2021). Co-production of Public Services: Institutional Barriers to the Involvement of Citizens in Policy Implementation. In The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant (pp. 651–667). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_26

Meng, Y., & Huang, L. (2025). Reflection and Practice of Design in Sustainable Community Building. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 17, Issue 5, pp. 111–123). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76803-3_8

Moesgen, T., Salovaara, A., Epp, F. A., & Sanchez, C. (2023). Designing for Uncertain Futures: An Anticipatory Approach. Interactions, 30(6), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3624698

Mukherjee, I., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). Designing for sustainable outcomes: espousing behavioural change into co-production programmes. Policy and Society, 37(3), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1383032

Mulya, A. (2024). Project Multatuli Ibu Kota Baru Untuk Siapa. Project Multatuli.

Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public Values Frames in Administration and Governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx009

Ongaro, E., Mititelu, C., & Sancino, A. (2021). A Strategic Management Approach to Co-commissioning Public Services. In The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (pp. 265–283). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_14

Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461

Osborne, S. P., Nasi, G., & Powell, M. (2021). Beyond co-production: Value creation and public services. Public Administration, 99(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12718

Padawangi, R., & Perkasa, A. (2022). Nusantara dan Perebutan Ruang Hidup di IKN. Project Multatuli.

Perdana, A. J. (2024). Building Nusantara: A comparative study on capital city relocation and the path towards a smart, sustainable urban future. E3S Web of Conferences, 495. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449501001

Permadi, I. (2024). Resolving Disputes Arising from Land Acquisition for Public Purposes Involving Indigenous Peoples in the Nusantara Capital Region. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(2), 705–748. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Peters, E. (2005). Indigeneity and marginalisation: Planning for and with urban Aboriginal communities in Canada. Progress in Planning, 63(4), 327–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2005.03.008

Pravitasari, A. E., Saizen, I., Tsutsumida, N., Rustiadi, E., & Pribadi, D. O. (2015). Local Spatially Dependent Driving Forces of Urban Expansion in an Emerging Asian Megacity: The Case of Greater Jakarta (Jabodetabek). Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n1p108

Project Multatuli. (2024). Panduan Perampasan Lahan Bank Tanah IKN. https://projectmultatuli.org/panduan-perampasan-lahan-bank-tanah-ikn/

Quesada, V., Gómez Ruiz, M. Á., Gallego Noche, M. B., & Cubero-Ibáñez, J. (2019). Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students’ perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970

Rachmawati, R., Haryono, E., Ghiffari, R. A., Reinhart, H., Fathurrahman, R., Rohmah, A. A., Permatasari, F. D., Sensuse, D. I., Sunindyo, W. D., & Kraas, F. (2024). Achieving Sustainable Urban Development for Indonesia’s New Capital City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190204

Rizqiyah, N. L. (2023). Tantangan Penerapan Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara. Souvereignty, 2, 292–298. https://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/view/80%0Ahttps://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/download/80/582

Roman, M., & Fellnhofer, K. (2022). Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: Implementing quadruple helix model in Finnish regions. Land Use Policy, 112(October 2021), 105864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105864

Rosen, J., & Painter, G. (2019). From Citizen Control to Co-Production. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1618727

Sari, D. P., Sumarno, A., Prasetyo, A. M., Maidina, & Ngeljaratan, L. N. (2023). Energy Conservation Techniques in Tropical Climate - A Comprehensive Review and Adaptation of the Lamin House for Nusantara. Evergreen, 10(3), 2021–2028. https://doi.org/10.5109/7151769

Schugurensky, D., & Mook, L. (2024). Participatory budgeting and local development: Impacts, challenges, and prospects. Local Development & Society, 5(3), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2024.2391664

Shekhawa, U., Jindal, R., & Saini, N. (2024). Empowering communities: The crucial role of local bodies. Disaster Human Crisis: Emergency, Response and Recovery, 259–285.

Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676

Syaban, A. S. N., & Appiah-Opoku, S. (2024). Unveiling the Complexities of Land Use Transition in Indonesia’s New Capital City IKN Nusantara: A Multidimensional Conflict Analysis. Land, 13(5), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050606

Tempo.co. (2024). Walhi Anggap IKN Minim Partisipasi Publik, Disebut Beda dengan Sejarah Jakarta.

Toukola, S., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., & Hällström, A. af. (2023). The co-creation of value by public and private actors in the front end of urban development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102542

Tribunnews.com. (2022). Jokowi Kumpulkan Tokoh Adat di Kaltim, Terima Semua Masukan Terkait Pemindahan dan Pembangunan IKN. https://kaltim.tribunnews.com/2022/02/03/jokowi-kumpulkan-tokoh-adat?jxrecoid=5c3a447c-383b-4cc9-8551-e6e2ba128d94~mix_tbn_internal&source=widgetArtikelRekomendasi&engine=JXA

Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020). The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42(2018), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009

van Holten, S., & van Rijswick, M. (2014). The governance approach in European Union environmental directives and its consequences for flexibility, effectiveness and legitimacy. In EU Environmental Legislation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781954775.00009

Wadipalapa, R. P., Nainggolan, P. P., & Katharina, R. (2023). Authority or Authoritarian? The Democratic Threats behind Indonesia’s New Capital City. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 45(3), 520–543. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs45-3n

Wickrama, T., Merten, M. J., & Perera, N. T. (2023). Writing a Literature Review (pp. 117–133). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6859-3.ch008




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v11i4.11789

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Elis Mardianti, Muhammad Dzulfikar Al Ghofiqi, Falih Suaedi, Erna Setijaningrum

Jurnal Public Policy
p-ISSN: 2477-5738  I  e-ISSN: 2502-0528  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +621260313742 l +6285277110911
License Creative Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License