Spirit of Bureaucratic Change of Decision Makers in Banyumas District Facing Challenges in the VUCA Era

Shadu Satwika Wijaya, Slamet Rosyadi


Decentralization requires the bureaucracy to be able to solve various problems faced by the community at the local level. Meanwhile, the context of social change in society is directly proportional to the complexity of opportunities. The greater the complexity of the opportunity, the greater the uncertainty. The VUCA Era created uncertainty in human civilization, including public administration. Public administration must ensure how far the uncertainties in the VUCA Era can be anticipated in efforts to organize public administration, particularly in the decision-making process. For this reason, this article aims to identify the spirit of change in decision-making bureaucrats in Banyumas Regency to face the VUCA Era. The method used is a descriptive quantitative approach. Data was collected using a survey method for decision-making bureaucrats within government agencies in Banyumas Regency. The results of the study show that the level of spirit of change in decision-maker bureaucrats in Banyumas Regency in facing challenges in the VUCA era is at a moderate level. This indicates that decision-making bureaucrats still need support and encouragement in facing challenges in the VUCA era, especially adaptability and sustainable positive change.


Bureaucratic Reform; Change DNA; Decision Maker; Local Government

Full Text:



Al-Hamid, R. (2021). Bureaucracy culture change of administrative services on COVID-19 pandemic era. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.53730/ijssh.v5n3.1720

Albejaidi, F., Mughal, Y. H., & Kundi, G. M. (2020). Decision making, leadership styles and leadership effectiveness: An amos-sem approach. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 9(1).

Benach, J. (2021). We Must Take Advantage of This Pandemic to Make a Radical Social Change: The Coronavirus as a Global Health, Inequality, and Eco-Social Problem. International Journal of Health Services, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420946594

Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193

Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing Public Participation Processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x

Campbell, R. W., & Meyer, M. W. (1980). Change in Public Bureaucracies. Political Science Quarterly, 95(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2150098

Cherry, K. (2020). The Democratic Style of Leadership. VeryWellMind, 3–5. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-democratic-leadership-2795315

Coaffee, J., & Deas, I. (2008). The search for policy innovation in urban governance: Lessons from community-led regeneration partnerships. Public Policy and Administration, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076707086254

Costa, P. T., Bagby, R. M., Herbst, J. H., & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Personality self-reports are concurrently reliable and valid during acute depressive episodes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 89(1–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2005.06.010

Costa, P. T., & Mccrae, R. R. (1998). Trait Theories of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8580-4_5

Cunningham, J. V. (1972). Citizen Participation in Public Affairs. Public Administration Review, 32. https://doi.org/10.2307/975227

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347

Ehn, P., Isberg, M., Linde, C., & Wallin, G. (2003). Swedish bureaucracy in an era of change. Governance, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00223

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Balogh, S., Kirk Emerson, G., Na batch, T. P., & Ba log, S. (2012). Public Management Research Association An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance An Integrative F. Source Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 22(1).

Enroth, H. (2014). Governance: The art of governing after governmentality. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013491818

Gogu, M. C. (2017). Adaptive management: from ecology to public administration. Global Journal of Sociology: Current Issues, 6(2), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v6i2.1479

Gong, T., & Yang, S. L. (2019). Controlling Bureaucratic Corruption. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1463

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing Research in the Real World (3rd ed.). In SAGE.

Groeneveld, S., Tummers, L., Bronkhorst, B., Ashikali, T., & van Thiel, S. (2015). Quantitative methods in public administration: Their use and development through time. International Public Management Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.972484

Hussain, A. (1984). The Bureaucracy as an Agent of Change. In Political Perspectives on the Muslim World. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17529-1_3

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2018). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. In Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147949

Jackson, K. D. (2021). 13. The Prospects for Bureaucratic Polity in Indonesia. In Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520311039-016

Johnston, E. (2010). Governance infrastructures in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02116.x

Jung, J. Y. (2008). Retreat of the state? Restructuring the Chinese central bureaucracies in the era of econonic globalization. China Review, 8(1).

Kanchoochat, V., & Hewison, K. (2016). Introduction: Understanding Thailand’s Politics. In Journal of Contemporary Asia (Vol. 46, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1173305

Kapur, A. (1990). Bureaucracy and Change. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556119900321

Karp, T. (2006). Transforming organisations for organic growth: The DNA of change leadership. Journal of Change Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010600565186

Kasali, R. (2015). Self Driving - Menjadi Driver atau Passenger. In Bandung.

LAN RI. (2021). Ciptakan Kader Birokrasi Agile di Era VUCA, Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta Luluskan 144 Mahasiswa. https://lan.go.id/?p=7594

Laothamatas, A. (2019). Business associations and the new political economy of thailand from bureaucratic polity to liberal corporatism. In Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429046209

Lewis, J. S. (2021). Corruption Perceptions and Contentious Politics in Africa: How Different Types of Corruption Have Shaped Africa’s Third Wave of Protest. Political Studies Review, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920903657

Macintosh, A., & Smith, E. (2007). Citizen Participation in Public Affairs. In Electronic Government. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46138-8_41

Mangan, J., Jackson, K. D., & Pye, L. W. (1981). Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 101(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/601235

McMillan, C. J., & Meyer, M. W. (1980). Change in Public Bureaucracies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392240

Mustanir, A., Justira N, Sellang K, & Muhtar, A. (2018). Democratic Model On Decision-Making At Deliberations Of Development Planning. International Conference on Government Leadership and Social Science (ICOGLASS). Demanding Governance Accountability and Promoting Democratic Leadership for Public Welfare Achievement, 110 – 115.

Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. In Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/6458

Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2010). Dynamic Governance - Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. In Dynamic Governance - Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812771919

Oleksiyenko, A. V. (2019). The Bureaucracy of Change: More Bureaucracy or More Change? https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23141-5_3

Pasmore, W., Winby, S., Mohrman, S. A., & Vanasse, R. (2019). Reflections: Sociotechnical Systems Design and Organization Change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1553761


Rashid, S., Masood, T., & Weston, R. H. (2009). Unified modelling in support of organization design and change. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(8). https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1181

Rosyadi, S. (2014). Prospek Pengembangan Aparatur Sipil Negara Berbasis Merit: Peluang Dan Tantangan Untuk Membangun Birokrasi Profesional Dan Berintegritas. Civil Servive: Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS, 8(1).

Sharma, D. L. J. K., & Singh, D. S. K. (2013). A Study on the Democratic Style of Leadership. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v3i2.1367

Stanford, N. (2018). Organization design, development and change. In Organization Design. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232102-3

van der Wal, Z. (2014). Harmony in hierarchy? how politicians and public managers prioritize crucial public values. In Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020140000003010

Vroom, V. H. (2003). Educating managers for decision making and leadership. Management Decision, 41(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310509490

Walliman, N. (2014). Quantitative Data Analysis. In Social Research Methods (pp. 110–128). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209939.n10

Williams, K., & Lewis, J. M. (2021). Understanding, measuring, and encouraging public policy research impact. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(3), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12506

Wirtz, B. W., & Müller, W. M. (2022). An Integrative Collaborative Ecosystem for Smart Cities — A Framework for Organizational Governance. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2001014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v9i3.7255


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Shadu Satwika Wijaya, Slamet Rosyadi

Jurnal Public Policy
p-ISSN: 2477-5738  I  e-ISSN: 2502-0528  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +621260313742 l +6285277110911
License Creative Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License