KONSEP ORWELISASI DAN PARKINSONISASI DALAM SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN PUBLIK

Yeni Sri Lestari

Abstract


This article discusses the importance of the role of the right government system within a country. One of the determinants of the good governance system is based on the accuracy in the selection of government bureaucracy system. Therefore, to provide a more detailed understanding, this article will discuss about the bureaucratic system. This review will examine two bureaucratic systems currently dominantly applied by most countries in the world, namely Orwell Bureaucracy (Orwellization) and Parkinson's Bureaucracy (Parkinsonization). This article is divided into four studies, first on the backgrounds of Orwell and Parkinson, the two studies on the concept of Orwellization and Parkinsonization framework, the three analyzing the application of both concepts within a country, and the fourth is criticism given by experts to the concept of Orwellization and Parkinsonization. In this study it is found that the concept of Orwellization and Parkinsonization is still relevant in studying the problems of bureaucratic systems in some countries, the concept of Orwellisasi can create a strong state but weaken the issue of Human Rights (HAM), while the concept of Parkinsonization contributed considerably in the development effort but weaken the system of recruitment of public officials. However, there are some experts who give criticism to the concept of  ureaucracy Orwellisasi and Parkinsonisasi this, this is not apart from weakness owned by each bureaucracy concept.

 

Keywords: bureaucracy, Orwellisasi, dan Parkinsonisasi 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Goerge Orwell. 1949. 1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four). United Kingdom: Secker & Warburg. C. Northcote Parkinson. 1957. Parkinson’s Law. USA: The Riverside Press.

Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern Organization. United States: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Liddle, R.W. 1985. Soeharto's Indonesia: Personal Rule and Political Institutions.Pacific Affairs. Vol 58(1): 68-90.

Syamsuddin Haris. 2014. Partai Pemilu, dan Parlemen Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Crouch, H. 1979. Patrimonialism and Military Rule in Indonesia. World Politics. Vol 31(4):571-587.

Ahmad Atory Hussain. 1998. Reformasi pentadbiran di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributions.

______. 1990. Pentadbiran awam: asas pemikiran dan falsafah. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.

______. 2001. Pengantar pentadbiran awam: paradigma baru. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.

James H. Mittelman. 1996. Globalization: critical reflection. Lynne Rienner Publisher.

Karl Jackson & Lucian Pye. 1978. Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.

Gordon R. Hein. 1982. Electoral Victory and Economic Adjustment for the New Order. Asian Survey. Vol. 23, No. 2, A Survey of Asia in 1982: Part II (Feb, 1983), pp. 178-190.

M.J. Esman. 1972. The Elements of Institution Building. In J. Eaton (ed). Institution Building and Development. Baverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Maizatul Haizan Mahbob. 2002. Pembangunan institusi dan pentadbiran di Malaysia. Dalam Politik Malaysia: perspektif teori dan praktik, disunting oleh Ghazali Mayudin. Bangi: UKM.

Evers, H. D. 1987. The bureaucratization of Southeast Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29 (4), 666-685.

David Osborne & Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government. Addison-Wesley.

Saefullah Fatah. 1998. Catatan atas gagalnya politik Orde Baru. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Parkinson, C.N. 1955. Parkinson's Law. The Economist.

http://www.economist.com/node/14116 121 [20 Mei 2014].

Priyo Budi Santoso. 1993. Birokrasi Pemerintah Orde Baru: Perspektif Kultural dan Struktural. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. (5th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Siti Alida John Abdullah & Halimah Ahmad. 2001. Penilaian Saiz Sektor Awam di Malaysia Semenjak Dasar Ekonomi Baru dan Perbandingan Dengan Beberapa Buah Negara. Sintok: Sintok Sekolah Pembangunan Sosial, Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Zuriana Zahrin & Aznida Shahidan. 2007. Perkembangan Saiz Sektor Awam di Malaysia: Perspektif teori dan Realiti. Dalam Isu-isu Kontemporari Pengurusan Awam. Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v3i2.66

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Public Policy

Jurnal Public Policy
p-ISSN: 2477-5738  I  e-ISSN: 2502-0528  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +621260313742 l +6285277110911
License Creative Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License