The Relevance of Collaborative Governance in Disaster Anticipation in The Cities of Surabaya and Jakarta

Deasy Ernawati, Ratri Istania, Asropi Asropi

Abstract


This research aims to examine the relevance of collaborative governance in flood disaster management within the smart city frameworks of Surabaya and Jakarta. Both cities are identified as having the highest flood disaster risk, yet disaster risk reduction has not been integrated effectively into their smart city initiatives, and flood management remains sectoral. Using the CORE (Collaborative Resilience) analysis and a qualitative research approach, this study investigates the extent of collaboration in disaster management in these cities. The findings reveal that in Surabaya, where the population is more homogeneous, smart city initiatives function effectively even without significant collaboration between actors. However, in Jakarta, with its more heterogeneous population, the absence of collaboration presents greater challenges. The research also highlights that collaboration is a critical factor in the success of smart city implementation, as seen in both cities. Surabaya's bureaucratic approach to disaster management, though efficient in execution, can be slow in response. Meanwhile, Jakarta’s smart city infrastructure, though more advanced, suffers from a lack of long-term collaborative policies. The study concludes that population homogeneity in cities like Surabaya allows for easier collaboration, while the complexity in Jakarta demands a more integrated and collaborative governance framework for effective flood management. Further research is needed to explore these dynamics in other Indonesian cities.

Keywords


Collaborative governance; Flood disaster management; Population heterogeneity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alazawi, Zubaida, et.al. (2014). WiMobCity’14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies for Smart city, August, page 1-10

Amalia, Dini, dkk. (2023). Implementasi Kota Pintar (Smart city) Di Kota Surabaya, Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintah Daerah, (5), (1), 57-63

Anez, Victoria Fernandez & Jose Miguel Fernandez, Rudolf Giffinger, (2017). Smart City implementation and discources: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 1-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004

Asropi, et.al. (2023). Community Empowerment Effectiveness in Waste Manajement with Maggot BSF Bioconversion In Tangerang City, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 21, (1), 40-50.

Caragliu, Andrea, et.al. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe, Journal of Urban Technology,18, (2), 65-82. http://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117

Choi, Hee-Sun & Seul-Ki Song. (2023). Direction for a Transition toward Smart Sustainable Cities Based on the Diagnosis of Smart City Plans, Smart Cities, 6,156-178. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010009

Christensen, Tom. (2012). Post-NPM and Changing Public Governance, Meiji journal of political science and economics, (1), 1-11

Christensen, Tom & Per Laegreid. (2010). Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration – Theoretical and Empirical Challenges, Public Organization Review, Published by Springer Nature

Collins, Charles R, et.al. 2016. Transforming social cohesion into informal social control: Deconstructing collective efficacy and the moderating role of neighbourhood racial homogeneity, Journal of Urban Affairs, (307-322). http://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1245079

Elvas, Luís B. et.al. (2021). Disaster Management in Smart Cities, Smart Cities Journal, MDPI, 4, (2), 819-839. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020042

Ernawati, Deasy, Raden Dwiarto, Yulia Nurul Aini, Asropi Asropi (2023). Responsive public complaint service innovation: The JAKI Application case in DKI Provincial Government, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 8, (1), 1-13. DOI: Prefix 10.26905.

Ferdous, Jannatul. (2016). The Journey of New Public Management: An Analysis, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 11, (2), 26-31.

Firmansyah, Yasef. (2019). Penerapan Konsep Jakarta Smart city Terhadap Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik Provinsi Jakarta Periode 2014-2017, Public Administration Journal, 3, (2), 125-144.

George, Alexander L & Andrew Bennett. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences, Publisher: MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United of America

Iqbal, dkk. (2022). Efektivitas Program Surabaya Smart city (SSC) Dalam Mewujudkan Smart Environment, Policy and Maritime Review, 1, (1)

Istania Ratri, dkk. (2022). People-Oriented Policy Sebagai Jembatan Pengantar Indonesia Berdamai dengan COVID-19, Jakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Obor

Jiang, Yawei and Brent W. Ritchie. (2017). Disaster Collaboration in tourism: Motives, impediments, and success factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Manajement, 31, 70-82.http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.09.004

Levy, Roger. (2010). New Public Management End of an Era? Public Policy and Administration Journal, 25, (2), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767093571

McGuire, Michael. (2006). Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know it, Public Administration Review, 66, Special Issue: Collaborative Public Management, 12, 33-43.

Meijer, Albert. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance, International of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2), 392-408. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564308

Moustakas, Louis, (2023). Social Cohesion: Definitions, Causes and Consequences, Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, 3, 1028-1037.

Nochta, Timea & Noura Wahby & Jennifer M.Schooling, (2021). Knowledge Politics in the smart city: A case study of strategic urban planning in Cambridge, UK. Data&Policy, Cambridge University Press,3:31. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.28

Sagun, Ayu, et.al. 2009. A Scenario-based study on information flow and collaboration patterns in disaster management, Journal of Disaster, 33, (2), 214-238.

Sangaji, Muhammad Salam Jabbar, et.al. 2021. Analisis Kebijakan Jakarta Smart city Menuju Masyarakat Madani, Journal of Government Insight, 1, (2), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.47030/jgi.v1i2.306

Sari, Devi Novita, et.al. 2020. Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Dalam Mewujudkan inovasi Smart city, Journal of Governance Innovation, 2, (2), 112-130.

Sukmaningsih, DW. et.al. 2019. Proposing Smart Disaster Manajement in Urban Area, Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database systems, 3-16.

Thatcher, David, 2006, The Normative Case Study, American Journal of Sociology, 111, 6,1631-1676

Visvizi, Anna &Shahira Assem Abdel-Razek&RomanWosiek&Radoslaw Malik. (2021).Conceptualizing Walking and Walkability in the

Warsono Hardi & R.Achmad Buchari, (2019). Kolaborasi Penanganan Bencana, Penerbit Trim Kunikata, Bandung Jawa Barat

Wataya, Eiko & Rajib Shaw. 2022. Soft Assets Consideration in Smart and Resilient City Development, Journal of Smart Cities, (5),108-130

Winkowska Justyna, et.al. 2019. Smart city Concept in the light of The Literature Review, Engineering Manajement in Production and Services, Published: Sciendo

World Risk Report, 2022, Berlin: Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, Ruhr University Bochum – Institute for International Law of Peace and Conflict

Xing, Huang, Li Xing, 2020. Key Factors and Coupling Relationships of Collaborative Governance for Disaster Prevention in China’s Coastal Cities, Risk Analysis, An International Journal, 41, (6), 895-910. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13586




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v10i2.8660

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Deasy Ernawati, Ratri Istania, Asropi Asropi

Jurnal Public Policy
p-ISSN: 2477-5738  I  e-ISSN: 2502-0528  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +621260313742 l +6285277110911
License Creative Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License