Identifikasi dan Mitigasi Risiko pada Proyek Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode House of Risk: Studi Kasus

Heri Tri Irawan, Iing Pamungkas, Hasnita Hasnita, Teuku Soleh Fauza

Abstract


PT. Rigis Beukarya Property is a developer and contractor for housing projects in the West Aceh region. Housing projects that are implemented often experience obstacles in the construction of the project, such as over budget from the predetermined RAB, repeated repairs, materials that are ordered late, and exposure to bad weather which results in large losses due to these obstacles. The aim of this research is to identify risks in the Grand Keutapang housing development process, and mitigate the dominant risks in the Grand Keutapang housing development process. The House of risk (HOR) method is used to solve this problem by identifying risk events, risk agents and also designing risk agent mitigation strategies based on Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP) values. The results obtained from the house of risk stage 1 risk mapping show that there are 5 dominant risk agents that will be taken into consideration in developing mitigation actions, namely: A-14 (Lack of coordination between parties involved) with an ARP value of 3,384, A-1 (Incompetent/careful workforce) with an ARP value of 1,800, A-12 (Fluctuating company financial cash flow) with an ARP value of 826 , A-15 (Lack of supervision in the field) with an ARP value of 777, and A-8 (Increase in material prices) with an ARP value of 696. From the results of the house of risk phase 2 risk mapping, 5 risk mitigation action plans were obtained, including: PA-1 (Creating a monitoring and sanctions system) with an ETDk value of 5,961, PA-2 (Creating a standard diary (buhas)) with an ETDk value of 3,331, PA-3 (Creating a complete checklist) with an ETDk value of 6,236, PA - 4 (Making adaptive cost estimates) with an ETDk value of 4,270, and PA-5 (Improving the effectiveness of communication with all parties) with an ETDk value of 8.427.


Keywords


House of risk; Risk identification; Risk mitigation; Construction project

Full Text:

PDF

References


Putri, M. N., Zaidir, A. H., & Hasan, A. (2015). Analisis manajemen resiko proyek pembangunan rumah sakit Universitas Andalas. In Prosiding 2nd Andalas Civil Engineering National Conference. Padang (Vol. 13).

Pamungkas, I., & Irawan, H. T. (2020). Strategi Pengurangan Risiko Kerusakan Pada Komponen Kritis Boiler di Industri Pembangkit Listrik. Jurnal Optimalisasi, 6(1), 86-95.

Pamungkas, I., Irawan, H. T., Arkanullah, L., Dirhamsyah, M., & Iqbal, M. (2019). Penentuan Tingkat Risiko pada Proses Produksi Garam Tradisional di Desa Ie Leubeu Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Optimalisasi, 5(2), 107-120.

Wena, M. (2015). Manajemen risiko dalam proyek konstruksi. Jurnal bangunan, 20(1-12), 2024.

Irawan, H. T., Pamungkas, I., & Muzakir, M. (2019). Analisis risiko rantai pasok komoditas cengkeh di Kecamatan Salang Kabupaten Simeulue. Jurnal Optimalisasi, 5(2), 72-81.

Saraswati, P. G., & Negoro, N. P. (2014). Identifikasi faktor kritis pada rencana pembangunan unit pembangkit listrik tenaga mini hidro Lodoyo Blitar dengan pendekatan House of Risk. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XXI, A-49-1-A-49-8.

Sibuea, M. E., & Saragi, H. S. (2019). Analisis risiko keterlambatan material dan komponen pada proyek pembangunan kapal dengan metode House of Risk (HOR) Studi Kasus: Pembangunan Kapal Ro-Ro 300 GT Danau Toba. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 21(2).

Irawan, H. T., Pamungkas, I., Putra, G., Sofiyanurriyanti, S., Kasmawati, K., & Fitriadi, F. (2023, February). Mitigation of clove supply chain risk using house of risk method. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2482, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Saffrudin, M. J., & Hasibuan, S. (2020). Strategi mitigasi risiko proyek konstruksi utilitas piping dan Pekerjaan Sipil: Studi Kasus PDAM Jakarta. Operations Excellence, 12(1), 74-87.

Kristanto, B. R., & Hariastuti, N. L. P. (2014). Aplikasi model house of risk (HOR) untuk mitigasi risiko pada supply chain bahan baku kulit.

Pamungkas, I., Irawan, H. T., & Hadi, K. (2023). Review Penggunaan Metode Pengendalian Kualitas pada Proses Manufaktur Kapal. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan, 2(4), 261-268.

Pamungkas, I. (2023). Application of Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale (BARS) Method to Assess Employee Performance at Diskoperindag Aceh Jaya. Jurnal Inotera, 8(2), 385-392.

Nyoman Pujawan, I., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953-967.

Ma, H. L., & Wong, W. H. C. (2018). A fuzzy-based House of Risk assessment method for manufacturers in global supply chains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(7), 1463-1476.

Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International journal of production research, 53(16), 5031-5069.

De Oliveira, U. R., Marins, F. A. S., Rocha, H. M., & Salomon, V. A. P. (2017). The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 616-633.

Zhao, G., Liu, S., Lopez, C., Chen, H., Lu, H., Mangla, S. K., & Elgueta, S. (2020). Risk analysis of the agri-food supply chain: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 4851-4876.

Sibevei, A., Azar, A., Zandieh, M., Khalili, S. M., & Yazdani, M. (2022). Developing a risk reduction support system for health system in Iran: a case study in blood supply chain management. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(4), 2139.

Basuki, M., Pamungkas, I., & Tamalika, T. (2023). Identifikasi Penyebab Kehilangan Crude Palm Oil (CPO) di Pabrik Kelapa Sawit. Jurnal Optimalisasi Vol, 9(01).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jopt.v10i01.9302

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Optimalisasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

JOPT: Jurnal Optimalisasi Indexing and Abstracting by: