Why Collaborative Governance Fails in Local Revenue Mobilization: Evidence from Indonesia

Fransiskus Suryanto Nara Bata, Aloysius Liliweri, Frans Gana, Hendrik Toda, I Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana

Abstract


This study explains why formally established collaborative arrangements produce limited effectiveness in local revenue mobilization, with specific attention to regional levy administration in Sikka Regency, Indonesia. Rather than treating leakage as a narrow technical or accounting problem, the article conceptualizes it as a governance problem generated through shallow collaboration among interdependent public organizations and affected stakeholders. The study employs a qualitative case study design based on in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis involving government agencies, field collectors, regulated actors, compliant and non-compliant levy payers, community beneficiaries, civil society organizations, and media actors. Guided by the collaborative governance framework of principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action, the analysis shows that collaboration exists procedurally but remains weak in substance. Principled engagement is constrained by narrow problem discovery, fragmented knowledge sharing, weak data-based deliberation, and limited collective determination. Shared motivation is weakened by inter-agency distrust, contested legitimacy, weak fiscal transparency, and uneven commitment to collective revenue goals. Capacity for joint action is undermined by hesitant leadership, thin institutional arrangements, non-integrated databases, weak monitoring routines, and limited administrative and digital support. The article advances the concept of shallow collaboration to describe a condition in which meetings, coordination language, and formal mandates are present, yet collective problem solving, relational commitment, and operational follow-through remain insufficient. The study contributes to collaborative governance and fiscal governance scholarship by showing how information fragmentation and relational weakness become mechanisms through which local revenue leakage is reproduced in decentralized settings. Its findings caution against assuming that formal coordination is equivalent to collaborative capacity and demonstrate why subnational revenue mobilization requires both institutionalized data integration and relationally credible governance.

Keywords


collaborative governance, revenue leakage, local revenue mobilization, subnational governance, regional levies, governance failure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, M. N., Tri Anomsari, E., Novira, A., & Sudartini, S. (2023). Collaborative governance in a mandated setting: shifting collaboration in stunting interventions at local level. Development Studies Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2212868

Aivalli, P., Dada, S., Gilmore, B., Srinivas, P. N., & De Brún, A. (2025). Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review. Health Policy and Planning, 40(6), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf022

Aoki, N., Tay, M., & Rawat, S. (2024). Whole-of-government and joined-up government: A systematic literature review. In Public Administration (Vol. 102, Number 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12949

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Bjärstig, T., Johansson, J., Mancheva, I., & Sandström, C. (2024). Collaboration as a policy instrument in public administration: Evidence from forest policy and governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2099

Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164

Budiarto, S., & Qibthiyyah, R. M. (2022). The Relationship of Organizing National Sports Events to Local Tax Revenue in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v11i2.208

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Chen, X., & Sullivan, A. A. (2023). Should I Stay or Should I Go? Why Participants Leave Collaborative Governance Arrangements. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac024

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003

Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: and what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731

Dai, J., & Azhar, A. (2024). Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development. Public Administration and Development, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2071

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. In Collaborative Governance Regimes. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12278

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Getha-Taylor, H., Grayer, M. J., Kempf, R. J., & O’Leary, R. (2019). Collaborating in the Absence of Trust? What Collaborative Governance Theory and Practice Can Learn From the Literatures of Conflict Resolution, Psychology, and Law. American Review of Public Administration, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018773089

Groenland, E., & Dana, L. P. (2019). Qualitative methodologies and data collection methods: Toward increased rigour in management research. In Qualitative Methodologies and Data Collection Methods: Toward Increased Rigour In Management Research. https://doi.org/10.1142/11449

Hambleton, R. (2015). Place-based collaboration: Leadership for a changing world. Administration, 63(3), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/admin-2015-0018

Infusi, M. Z., Kusuma, G. P., & Arham, D. A. (2022). Prediction of Local Government Revenue using Data Mining Method. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.46338/IJETAE0122_07

Jones, D. A. (2023). A Review and Critical Analysis of Qualitative Methodologies and Data-Collection Techniques Used for Code-Switching Research. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12988

Kim, S., & Sullivan, A. (2023). Connecting the composition of collaborative governance structure to community-level performance in homeless services. Public Administration Review, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13632

Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. In The American journal of occupational therapy. : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association (Vol. 45, Number 3). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214

Krogh, A. H., & Triantafillou, P. (2024). Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model. Public Management Review, 26(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2313539

Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. Qualitative Report, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008

Mahama, P. Y., Abdulai, A. G., & Asamoah, K. (2024). Local revenue mobilisation in Ghana: Why similar metropolitan and municipal assemblies exhibit different outcomes. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100853

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

McComb, E. J., Boyd, S., & Boluk, K. (2017). Stakeholder collaboration: A means to the success of rural tourism destinations? A critical evaluation of the existence of stakeholder collaboration within the Mournes, Northern Ireland. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415583738

Mcguirk, P. M., O’Neill, P. M., & Mee, K. J. (2015). Effective Practices for Interagency Data Sharing: Insights from Collaborative Research in a Regional Intervention. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12098

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.

Moore, J., Elliott, I. C., & Hesselgreaves, H. (2023). Collaborative Leadership in Integrated Care Systems; Creating Leadership for the Common Good. Journal of Change Management, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2023.2261126

Mujiyati, M., Zulfikar, Z., Witono, B., & Utomo, I. C. (2024). The impact of digital platforms in tax administration services on local government tax revenues: evidence from Indonesia. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(2).2024.16

Nasution, A. (2017). The government decentralization program in indonesia. In Central and Local Government Relations in Asia: Achieving Fiscal Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436870.00017

Øjvind Nielsen, R., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2024). Drivers of collaborative governance for the green transition. Public Management Review, 26(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2358321

Pradana, I. P. Y. B. (2014). Transparansi Birokrasi dalam Pengelolaan APBD di Kota Kupang. Transparansi Birokrasi Dalam Pengelolaan APBD Di Kota Kupang, 18(2).

Qi, H., & Ran, B. (2024). Paradoxes in collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 26(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2196290

Ridder, H.-G. (2012). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 26(1).

Saito, H., & Ruhanen, L. (2017). Power in tourism stakeholder collaborations: Power types and power holders. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.01.001

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

Shofura, A., & Setyadharma, A. (2023). The Analysis of Factors Affecting Original Local Government Revenue in Eastern Indonesia. Efficient: Indonesian Journal of Development Economics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/efficient.v6i1.55864

Siddiki, S., & Ambrose, G. (2023). Evaluating Change in Representation and Coordination in Collaborative Governance Over Time: A Study of Environmental Justice Councils. Environmental Management, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01688-7

Thabit, S., Sancino, A., & Mora, L. (2025). Strategic public value(s) governance: A systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 85(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13877

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Vento, I. (2020). Hands-off or Hands-on Governance for Public Innovation? A Comparative Case Study in the EU Cohesion Policy Implementation in Finland. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1665065

Vento, I. (2024). Trust, collaboration, and participation in governance: A Nordic perspective on public administrators’ perceptions of citizen involvement. Public Administration Review, 84(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13833

Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., de Jong, J., & Keijser, B. (2020). Paradoxes of collaborative governance: investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. Public Management Review, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056

Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389

Wang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2023). Enhancing Collaborative Emergency Management: Leveraging Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Inter-Agency Data Sharing. EM-GIS 2023 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Security Response Using GIS 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3615884.3629423

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yudhistira, M. H., Brodjonegoro, B. P. S., & Qibthiyyah, R. M. (2024). Unlocking Urban Potential. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2389492

Yuliadi, I. (2023). Determinants of Local Government Revenue: A Survey of Regional Economic Development in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 24(193). https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.193.23

Yusuf, N.-. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Policy in Improving the Regional Economy: A Spatial Econometric Approach. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 24(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.54803

Zulfi, M. R., & Wijaya, S. (2024). Factors Affecting The Local Taxes Revenue By Provincial Governments In Indonesia. Educoretax, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v4i1.718




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v12i3.15014

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Fransiskus Suryanto Nara Bata, Aloysius Liliweri, Frans Gana, Hendrik Toda, I Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana

Jurnal Public Policy
p-ISSN: 2477-5738  I  e-ISSN: 2502-0528  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +621260313742 l +6285277110911
License Creative Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License