Analisis Six Big Loss Pada Mesin Pengolahan Minyak CPO dengan Metode OEE (Studi Kasus: di PT. Fajar Baizury and Brother)

Arie Saputra, Muzakir Muzakir, Munti Suryani

Abstract


This study discusses determining each CPO oil processing machine in the production process using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness method, determining the percentage of each factor contained in the six major losses and determining the dominant factors needed in the CPO oil processing machine. Based on the results of the study showed that the OEE value of each of the CPO oil processing machines OEE value on the strelelizer was 71.41%, for the Thesher / Thickening machine at 75.64%, for the Screw Press machine at 68.21 and OEE value on the clarification machine is 78.16% while the six major loss factor has the greatest proportion of time loss and needs to be repaired is reducing the speed of loss that is equal to 84.62%, this condition shows the ability of the press and clarification machine in achieving the target production and in achieving the ideal conditions that is yaitu85%. Percentage of the magnitude of the factors contained in the six major losses, namely the strelelizer machine due to the Process of Disability Losses and Yield Reduction with the same percentage level that is equal to 49.03%, on the Threser machine caused by Reduction of Speed Loss with a percentage level of 72.70%, on Press machines Generated by Reduced Speed Loss with a percentage level of 34.50% and Clarification machines caused by Reduced Speed Loss with a percentage level of 84.62%, from the four CPO processing machines a factor of six large losses that is, on a disadvantage machine, this is difficult to avoid because of this deficiency also because of the poor quality of CPO oil due to free fatty acid levels and high water content. The dominant factor influencing the effectiveness of the use of CPO oil processing machines that occurred during the period August 2018-July 2019 with the OEE method on the Screw Press machine that is equal to 73.85% as expected based on world class OEE standards (85%) using with other machines this is caused by the speed and pressure when processing FFB is reduced / unstable, the press machine that is used often to repair the damage produced does not meet the expected quality and quantity specifications.

Keywords


Six Big Losses; CPO Processing Machine; Overall Equipment Effectiveness; Total Productive Maintenance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansori, N. M., 2013, Sistem perawatan Terpadu, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Assauri, S., 2008, Tujuan Maintenance Blancard Logisticts engineering And management pemeliharaan, Erlangga, Surabaya.

Dhillon, B. S., 2006, Maintainability, Maintenance, and Reliability for Engineers, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

Gaspersz, V., 2004, Production Planning and Inventory Control Edisi Ketiga, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Hasriyono, M., 2009, Evaluasi Efektivitas Mesin dengan Penerapan Total Productive Mainenance (TPM) di PT. Hadi Baru, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jurusan Teknik Industri.

Kartika, E., 2010, Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Six Big Losses Pada Mesin yang Mempengaruhi Efisiensi Produksi di PT. Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jurusan Teknik Industri.

Kurniawan, F., 2013, Manajemen Perawatan Industri: Teknik dan Aplikasi, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Kigsirisina, S. P., 2016, Approach for Total Productive Maintenance Evaluation in Water Productivity: A Case Study at Mahasawat Water Treatment Plant, Procedia Engineering, vol 154, hal 260-267.

Nayak, E.A., 2013, Evaluation of OEE In A Continuous Process Industry On An Insulation Line In A Cable Manufacturing Unit, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol 2, no 5.

Muchiri, P. L., 2006, Performance Measurement Using Overall Equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature Review & Practical Application Discussion, International Journal of Production Research.

Murnawan, H. M., 2008, Perencanaan Produktivitas Kerja Dari Hasil Evaluasi Produktivitas Dengan Metode Fishbone Di Perusahaan Percetakan Surabaya, Jurnal Teknik Industri.

Nachnul, A., 2013, Sistem Perawatan Terpadu, Buku Teknik Edisi Pertama, Yogyakarta.

Nakajima, S., 1988, Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance, Producticity Press Inc, Cambridge, MA.

Osama, T. R., 2010, Total Productive Maintenance Review and Overall Equipment Effectiveness Measurement, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.

Viroolin, C. S., 2017, Analisis Efektivitas Mesin Hopper Dengan Metode Overall Equipment Effectiveness dan FMEA, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jurusan Teknik Industri.

Yoshikazu, T., Takashi Osada., 2000, Total Productive Maintenance-TPM, Technical Report, Lulea Tekniska Universite.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jopt.v6i1.1882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Optimalisasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

JOPT: Jurnal Optimalisasi Indexing and Abstracting by: